"Agent Washing" Is the New Greenwashing. Here's How to Spot Fake AI Agents.

Gartner dropped a stat last year that should worry every business leader shopping for AI solutions: of the thousands of vendors claiming to sell "AI agents," only about 130 are actually building genuinely agentic systems.

The rest? They're agent washing.

What Is Agent Washing?

The term borrows from "greenwashing" in sustainability — where companies slap eco-friendly labels on products that aren't actually environmentally sound. Agent washing is the AI equivalent: taking chatbots, RPA scripts, or basic automation tools and rebranding them as "autonomous AI agents" without adding any real agentic capabilities.

It's happening everywhere. Investor decks with "agent-based platform" raise eyebrows (and sometimes funding). Marketing teams know "agent" sounds more intelligent and next-gen than "workflow" or "bot." And most business leaders don't know the technical difference between an LLM chatbot and a genuine agentic system.

This makes it embarrassingly easy to blur the lines.

Why This Matters for Your Business

The consequences aren't just semantic. When 40% of agentic AI projects are projected to be canceled by 2027 due to unclear business value, the root cause is often agent washing. Companies buy solutions expecting autonomous execution and get glorified chatbots that still require constant human intervention.

The cycle is predictable: vendors overpromise, customers over-invest, projects under-deliver. The resulting disappointment doesn't just hurt individual companies — it taints the entire category. When your "AI agent" fails, the lesson learned isn't "we bought the wrong vendor." It's "AI agents don't work."

They do work. You just got sold a fake one.

Red Flags: How to Spot Agent Washing

Here's what to watch for when evaluating AI agent vendors:

1. Grandiose Claims of Full Autonomy

No current AI agent is truly fully autonomous in enterprise contexts. If a vendor insists their agent can completely run on its own with human-level decision-making, that's a major red flag. Real agents still operate within defined guardrails and require human oversight for high-stakes decisions.

2. Repackaged Old Tools

A lot of agent washing involves taking familiar technologies — chatbots, digital assistants, simple RPA scripts — and slapping "autonomous agent" on them without adding new capabilities. Ask: what can this do that a well-configured chatbot can't?

3. No Persistent State or Memory

True agents maintain context across sessions. They remember your preferences, past decisions, and ongoing projects. If every interaction starts fresh, you're looking at a stateless tool, not an agent.

4. Can't Execute Multi-Step Tasks Without Hand-Holding

The defining characteristic of agentic systems is autonomous execution. If the "agent" requires you to approve every step, break down every task, and constantly redirect — it's just a fancy interface for manual work.

5. No Integration with Real Systems

Agents that can only chat but can't connect to your email, calendar, CRM, or databases aren't agents. They're conversation engines. Real agentic systems need to touch real infrastructure to execute real tasks.

What Real Agents Actually Look Like

Genuine agentic AI has specific characteristics that separate it from the pretenders:

Autonomous Task Completion: You assign a goal, and the agent figures out the steps, executes them, and handles edge cases without constant supervision.

Persistent Memory: The agent builds a relationship with you over time. It remembers your communication style, past decisions, and ongoing context — like a colleague who's been working with you for months.

Real-World Integration: Beyond just chatting, real agents connect to your actual tools and systems. They send emails, update spreadsheets, schedule meetings, and process documents.

Graceful Failure Handling: When something goes wrong, real agents don't just error out. They try alternatives, ask for clarification when genuinely stuck, and learn from mistakes.

Proactive Behavior: Instead of waiting for prompts, genuine agents can monitor situations and act when appropriate — flagging issues, suggesting improvements, or completing routine tasks on schedule.

The Questions to Ask Vendors

Before you buy, put vendors through a simple filter:

1. "Can I see it complete a multi-step task without intervention?" If the demo requires constant prompting, that's your answer.
2. "How does it remember context from last week?" Vague answers about "conversation history" aren't good enough. Ask for specifics about memory architecture.
3. "What systems does it actually connect to?" A list of "coming soon" integrations is a red flag. Real agents ship with real integrations.
4. "What happens when it fails?" Listen for specifics about error handling, retry logic, and escalation paths. Handwaving is a warning sign.
5. "Can I talk to a customer who's been using it in production for 6+ months?" Agent washing falls apart over time. The agents that work have references who can speak to sustained performance.

The Opportunity in the Noise

Here's the flip side: because so much of the market is agent washing, the genuine solutions stand out dramatically once you know what to look for.

Companies using real agentic AI are seeing transformative results — 80% automation rates on transactional decisions, response times dropping from days to minutes, and teams freed from repetitive work to focus on high-value judgment calls.

The technology works. The hype is real (for the 130 vendors actually building it). The challenge is just filtering signal from noise.

Want to see what genuine AI employees actually look like? We built Geta.Team around exactly this problem — AI workers with persistent memory, real integrations, and autonomous execution. No agent washing, just results. Try it here: https://geta.team